King v. Scott et al
John King |
Darrell Scott and Carolyn Scott |
1:2022cv00560 |
February 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J P Boulee |
Catherine M Salinas |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Remark re #5 Order: Certified copy of order of remand received by Magistrate Court of Newnan County. (cmd) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. #3 ] as the judgment of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this action is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Newton County for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on 3/4/2022. (cmd) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, to District Judge J. P. Boulee. (bgt) |
Civil Case Terminated. (cmd) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to John King, Carolyn Scott, Darrell Scott re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (cmd) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Clerk of Court, Magistrate Court of Newton County re certified copy of #5 Order. (cmd) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to John King, Carolyn Scott, Darrell Scott re Notice (Other). (rlh) |
NOTICE: Effective immediately, all communications related to cases assigned to Judge Boulee should be directed to 404-215-1410 or CRD_JPB@gand.uscourts.gov. (rlh) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/14/22. (ceo) |
Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Carolyn Scott, Darrell Scott: It is RECOMMENDED that this civil action be remanded to the Magistrate Court of Newton County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/14/22. (ceo) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Carolyn Scott, Darrell Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
ORDER: I DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Scotts's motion for permission to proceed IFP because it is incomplete. #1 . I ORDER the Scotts either (A) TO PAY the $402 due in case initiation fees or (B) TO SUBMIT a complete IFP affidavit WITHIN SEVEN DAYS of the entry date of this Order. I caution the Scotts that failure to comply fully with a lawful court order is an independent ground for dismissal. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/14/22 per #3 Final R&R. (ceo) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to John King, Carolyn Scott, Darrell Scott re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (ceo) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Carolyn Scott and Darrell Scott. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.