Diarra v. Department Homeland Security (DHS) et al
Moussa Diarra |
Department Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE) |
1:2022cv00586 |
February 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
William M Ray |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Moussa Diarra re #4 Order. (abm) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker terminated from case. (abm) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action and to CONSOLIDATE it with No. 1:21-CV-5209-WMR-LTW. Petitioner's motions #2 and #3 are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/17/2022. (abm) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity Determination, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and #3 MOTION Waiver of Service to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (ane) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Waiver of Service by Moussa Diarra. (ane) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Moussa Diarra. (ane) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Moussa Diarra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ane) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.