Estrada v. Target Corporation
| Michael Estrada |
| Target Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Target |
| 1:2022cv00612 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice by Michael Estrada. (Pope, Matthew) |
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #8 Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (dmb) |
Filing 9
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively close this case due to settlement. The case may be re-opened if necessary. The parties are ORDERED to file documents to dispose of the case within 60 days of the date of this Order. Absent an extension of that deadline or further order of the Court, if no request to reopen the case is made within 60 days, the case will be considered dismissed with prejudice at that time. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 5/10/2022. (dmb)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (dmb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Michael Estrada (Pope, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Target Corporation. Discovery ends on 9/6/2022.(Rosen, Evan) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Target Corporation's answer shall be due on 4/11/2022. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on March 2, 2022. (ash)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Target Corporation. (Rosen, Evan) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER Regarding Civil Litigation. Ordered by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on February 15, 2022. (ash)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (cavc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Estrada. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11590497) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cavc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2022: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (cavc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estrada v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Estrada | |
| Represented By: | Matthew N. Pope |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Target | |
| Represented By: | Evan Michael Rosen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
