Watson v. Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC
Shirley Watson |
Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC |
1:2022cv01227 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Steven D Grimberg |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE re #5 Notice of Settlement filed by Shirley Watson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the right of Plaintiff or Defendant, anytime within forty-five (45) days of entry of this Order, to reopen this action so as to request enforcement of the settlement or to vacate this order of dismissal. It is further ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order of dismissal and to reopen the action, if necessary. If the action has not been reopened or the Court has not received a motion to vacate on or before the time permitted by this Order, the action will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 05/20/2022. (jkb) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath terminated from case. (jkb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement of all claims. by Shirley Watson (Sandt, Jillian) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, #3 Return of Service Executed of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint Until May 19, 2022 by Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC. (Olson, Frank) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:22-cv-01227-SDG-JEM. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (rsg) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Shirley Watson. Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC served on 3/30/2022, answer due 4/20/2022. (Sandt, Jillian) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Shirley Watson. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11690972) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit -Plaintiff's Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Watson v. Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shirley Watson | |
Represented By: | Jillian Sandt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cobb, Olson & Andrle, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.