Sardelli-Sussman v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Alyse Sardelli-Sussman |
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc. and CooperSurgical, Inc. |
1:2022cv01242 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Valet on behalf of Alyse Sardelli-Sussman (Valet, Thomas) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to Fred Erny on 3/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Waiver of the Service of Summons, #2 Summons Waiver of the Service of Summons, #3 Summons Waiver of the Service of Summons, #4 Summons Waiver of the Service of Summons)(Valet, Thomas) |
|
Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Alyse Sardelli-Sussman. Direct File MDL - USDC, Eastern Division of New York. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11695499) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Civil Case Terminated. (lwb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.