Sasha Homes LLC et al v. Morton et al
Sasha Homes LLC and Regal Capital Ventures LLC |
Kovaris Morton, And All Other Occupants, Global BC Trust and Bey Armstrong |
1:2022cv01244 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
John K Larkins |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Kovaris Morton re #5 Order, #6 Letter returned via USPS marked "Return to Sender". (ddm) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Kovaris Morton re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 Final Report and Recommendation returned via USPS marked "Return to Sender". (ddm) |
Filing 6 Letter to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County, Georgia regarding the remand of this action to their court. (ddm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2022: #1 Envelope Receipt from Fulton County) (ddm). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/20/2022: #2 Acceptance of Filing from Fulton County) (ddm). |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting the #3 Final Report and Recommendation as the Opinion and Order of this Court and remanding this action to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 04/19/2022. (ddm) |
Civil Case Terminated. (ddm) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Bey Armstrong, Global BC Trust, Kovaris Morton re #5 Order, #6 Letter. (ddm) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Global BC Trust, Bey Armstrong, And All Other Occupants, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (pdw) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 03/31/2022. (rsg) |
Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal. Because it is clear that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the removal action, it is RECOMMENDED that the case be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 03/31/2022. (rsg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Global BC Trust, Bey Armstrong, And All Other Occupants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Bey Armstrong, Global BC Trust, Kovaris Morton re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Order, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rsg) |
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for the limited purpose of remand. Ruled on within the #3 R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 03/31/2022. (rsg) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Bey Armstrong. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.