Pellegrino v. 12-Bray, LLC et al
Louis Gregory Pellegrino |
12-Bray, LLC and Dwight David Howard |
1:2022cv01264 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
William M Ray |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by 12-Bray, LLC, Dwight David Howard. Discovery ends on 9/29/2022.(Averbuch, Allison) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 5 Waiver of Service by Louis Gregory Pellegrino (Acceptance of Service and Responsive Pleading Deadline) . Answer due 5/2/2022 for all defendants. (Pearson, Todd) Modified on 4/4/2022 to edit docket text (abm). |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 04/01/2022. (rvb) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Dwight David Howard. (eop) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to 12-Bray, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Louis Gregory Pellegrino. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11697421) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.