Lemery v. Supreme Court of Georgia
Steven Lemery |
Supreme Court of Georgia |
1:2022cv01373 |
April 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
J P Boulee |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #6 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, to District Judge J. P. Boulee. (anc) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration of #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation by Steven Lemery. (anc) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered dismissing action for failure to state a claim (anc)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4 ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on 5/9/2022. (anc) |
Civil Case Terminated. (anc) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Steven Lemery re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment. (anc) |
Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief, filed by Steven Lemery, to District Judge J. P. Boulee. (ceo) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Steven Lemery re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief, filed by Steven Lemery, Order ruling on IFP, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (abm) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 4/21/2022. (abm) |
Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief, filed by Steven Lemery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 4/21/2022. (abm) |
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 4/21/2022. (abm) |
Submission of #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Steven Lemery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lemery v. Supreme Court of Georgia | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven Lemery | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Supreme Court of Georgia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.