Dashrathbhai v. Mayorkas et al
| Dashrathbhai Patel |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Tracy Renaud, Director for the Vermont Service Center for the USCIS and The United States of America |
| 1:2022cv01383 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notification of Docket Correction of Plaintiff's name. (tas) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to United States Attorney. (tas) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Director for the Vermont Service Center for the USCIS. (tas) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Tracy Renaud. (tas) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland. (tas) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (tas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Patel Dashrathbhai. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11718459) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
