Horvath v. Blinken et al
| Alexander Horvath |
| Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Michael S. Yeager and David Byrne |
| 1:2022cv01413 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| John K Larkins |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY BRIEF re #7 MOTION for Bond filed by Alexander Horvath. (Kaplan, Nicole) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time file reply brief in support of petition re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Alexander Horvath. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Nicole) |
ORDER by docket entry only granting Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time #13 . Petitioner shall have through and including June 21, 2022 to file his reply in support of his petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins III on 6/8/22. (JKL)
|
| Filing 12 Certification of Consent to Substitution of Counsel. Nicole M. Kaplan replacing attorney Kimberly Sharkey. (Kaplan, Nicole) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Bond filed by Anthony Blinken. (Huber, Christopher) |
| Submission of #10 Order,to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (hfm) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER directing Respondents to file response to #7 MOTION for Bond filed by Alexander Horvathno later than 5/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 5/18/2022. (dob)
|
| Submission of #7 MOTION for Bond , to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (hfm) |
| Filing 9 Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): May 30, 2022 through June 10, 2022, by Christopher J. Huber. (Huber, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Habeas Corpus Petition re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, In Opposition filed by Anthony Blinken. (Huber, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Bond by Alexander Horvath. (Sharkey, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. Huber on behalf of Michael S. Yeager (Huber, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. Huber on behalf of Anthony Blinken, David Byrne, Merrick Garland (Huber, Christopher) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing Clerk to perfect service of petition and order on respondent by certified mail, with copy to U.S. Attorney. Respondent is directed to show cause within 30 days of receipt of order why writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 4/13/2022. (anc)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to David Byrne via Certified Mail re #4 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition. (anc) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 4/13/22. (bnw)
|
| Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (eop) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Alexander Horvath. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(eop) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Alexander Horvath. (Attachments: #1 Petition - Part 2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
