Johnson v. Geo Secure Services et al
Arthur Antonio Johnson |
Geo Secure Services, D. Bryne, R. Smith, A. Sears, C. Ray and GEO Group Inc. |
1:2022cv01420 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Russell G Vineyard |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Partial Filing Fee Paid: $ 18.00, receipt number GAND100138931. (dob) |
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Arthur Antonio Johnson re #4 Order to Show Cause. (dob) |
Submission of #3 Order, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (hfm) |
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Arthur Antonio Johnson re #3 Order ruling on IFP,Forms sent to party: 28:1331 Forms. (vs) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (eop) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Arthur Antonio Johnson. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arthur Antonio Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.