Thomas v. Kemp et al
| Albert C. Thomas |
| Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly, Caryl Deems, Linda Winston, Terry E. Barnard and Arianna Brown |
| 1:2022cv01475 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 USCA Acknowledgment of #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Albert C. Thomas. Case Appealed to USCA- 11th Circuit. Case Number 22-11638-GG. (pjm) |
| Pursuant to F.R.A.P.11(c), the Clerk certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal, #7 Notice of Appeal. Case Appealed to USCA- 11th Circuit. Case Number 22-11638-GG. The entire record on appeal is available electronically. (pjm) |
| Filing 9 Transmission of Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal, Judgment, Orders and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #7 Notice of Appeal. (pjm) |
| Filing 8 USCA Appeal Transmission Letter to 11th Circuit re: #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Albert C. Thomas. (pjm) |
| Filing 10 Letter from Albert C. Thomas to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath re Contact Information (kxm) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Clerk's Judgment and #5 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, by Albert C. Thomas. (pjm) Modified on 5/16/2022 to change the file date to 5/5/2022 (bgt). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that the action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (anc)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER that the Clerk is DIRECTED to DISMISS Plaintiffs' Complaint #3 WITHOUT PREJUDICE as failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because the Complaint is dismissed, Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel #4 is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 4/26/2022. (anc)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Albert C. Thomas re #6 Clerk's Judgment, #5 Order. (anc) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (anc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Albert C. Thomas. (anc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Albert C. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Part 2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(anc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE the present reference to the undersigned Magistrate Judge and SUBMIT the case to the District Judge for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 4/20/2022. (anc)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Albert C. Thomas re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (anc) |
| Submission of #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 Complaint for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (anc) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (eop) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Albert C. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint - Part 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
