Santos v. M & D K Contractors, Inc. et al
Julio Antonio Santos |
M & D K Contractors, Inc. and Edwin Santos |
1:2022cv01619 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Sarah E Geraghty |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Julio Antonio Santos. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Waiver of Service - Edwin Santos)(Thomas, Brandon) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Julio Antonio Santos. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Waiver of Service - Edwin Santos)(Thomas, Brandon) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 5/5/2022. (sap) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Julio Antonio Santos First Notice of Consent Filing (Attachments: #1 Appendix Consent form - Julio Antonio Santos)(Thomas, Brandon) |
Filing 1 COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Julio Antonio Santos. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11753242) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified text on 4/26/2022 (eop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.