McFaddin et al v. Pumphrey DDS P.C. et al
Laneice S. McFaddin and Melissa L. Stewart |
David W. Pumphrey DDS P.C. also known as Pumphrey Periodontics doing business as Dental Implant Therapy, Pumphrey Periodontics and David W. Pumphrey |
1:2022cv01778 |
May 5, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
William M Ray |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Certification of Consent to Substitution of Counsel. Todd Orlando Pearson replacing attorney Todd Orlando Pearson. (Pearson, Todd) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT and Affirmative Defenses by David W. Pumphrey, David W. Pumphrey DDS P.C.. Discovery ends on 11/7/2022.(Holladay, William) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Laneice S. McFaddin, Melissa L. Stewart (Acceptance of Service and Responsive Pleading Deadline) (Pearson, Todd) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to David W. Pumphrey. (cavc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Laneice S. McFaddin, Melissa L. Stewart. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11780882) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cavc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.