Adams v. Gwinnett County Administrative Office of The Courts
William J. Adams |
Gwinnett County Administrative Office of The Courts |
1:2022cv01803 |
May 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
Victoria M Calvert |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William J. Adams, #6 MOTION to Amend, to District Judge Victoria M. Calvert. (vs) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Present Objections, Testimony, and Evidence by William J. Adams. (lwb) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Service of #4 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on May 26, 2022. (lwb) |
Filing 4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William J. Adams. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on May 26, 2022. (lwb) |
ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Dismiss Counsel without prejudice. Petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on May 26, 2022, within the #4 R&R. (lwb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to William J. Adams re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William J. Adams, #5 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (lwb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Of Filing Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control by Person in State Pre-Trial Detention re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William J. Adams. (lwb) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (jra) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Counsel by William J. Adams. (jra) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William J. Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adams v. Gwinnett County Administrative Office of The Courts | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: William J. Adams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Gwinnett County Administrative Office of The Courts | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.