DIARRA v. U.S DISTRICT COURT CLERK NORTHERN DIST. GEORGIA et al
| MOUSSA DIARRA |
| U.S DISTRICT COURT CLERK NORTHERN DIST. GEORGIA, Debra Deberry and Melody M. Maddox |
| 1:2022cv01862 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Linda T Walker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (tas)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 8
ORDER adopting #6 Final Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 6/14/2022. (tas)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tas) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to MOUSSA DIARRA re #8 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #9 Clerk's Judgment. (tas) |
| Submission of #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MOUSSA DIARRA, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (jkl) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Service of #6 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 5/17/2022. (tas)
|
| Filing 6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MOUSSA DIARRA. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 5/17/2022. (tas) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to MOUSSA DIARRA re #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MOUSSA DIARRA, #7 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,. (tas) |
|
ORDER denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The three strikes provision bars a prisoner from filing a civil action in federal court without paying the filing fee. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 5/17/2022. Within #6 R&R. (tas)
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-01634. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/10/22. 5/10/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 5/10/2022.]
|
| Submission of #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (aar) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 5/10/2022.] |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MOUSSA DIARRA.(bw) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 5/10/2022.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MOUSSA DIARRA..(bw) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 5/10/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
