Witt v. Georgia Department of Corrections
| Vincent Tyler Witt |
| Georgia Department of Corrections |
| 1:2022cv01993 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| John K Larkins |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (kxm)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Vincent Tyler Witt re #5 Clerk's Judgment, #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (kxm) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (kxm) |
Filing 4
ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff has not named as defendant an entity that is capable of being sued; the proper entity would enjoy immunity under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution; and the Northern District of Georgia is not the proper venue for Plaintiffs claims. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 6/30/2022. (kxm)
|
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 6/9/2022. (kxm)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDEDED that this action be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 6/9/2022. (kxm) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Vincent Tyler Witt re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (kxm) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III for frivolity determination. (tas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Vincent Tyler Witt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Witt v. Georgia Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vincent Tyler Witt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
