Mead v. Haier US Appliance
| Tracy L. Mead |
| Haier US Appliance |
| 1:2022cv02016 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tracy L. Mead re #7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jpa) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Haier US Appliance's Answer due 7/27/2022. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 6/23/22. (jpa)
|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond to Complaint re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Haier US Appliance. (Bryan, Callie E.) Modified on 6/24/2022 to correct motion type (jpa). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint no later than 6/27/2022. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 5/31/22. (jpa)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Haier US Appliance's answer due 6/27/2022. (jpa) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tracy L. Mead re #5 Order (jpa) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond to Complaint by Haier US Appliance. (Bryan, Callie E.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Mark H. Cohen for all further proceedings. Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:22-cv-02016-MHC. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 5/24/2022. (tcc)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tracy L. Mead re #3 Order Reassigning Case. (tcc) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Haier US Appliance identifying Corporate Parent Haier US Appliance Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd. for Haier US Appliance. (adg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT, filed by Haier US Appliance. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11816191) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal (State), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mead v. Haier US Appliance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracy L. Mead | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Haier US Appliance | |
| Represented By: | Callie E. Dickson Bryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
