Kengne v. AGSouth Farm Credit, ACA et al
Raissa Djuissi Kengne |
AGSouth Farm Credit, ACA and AGFirst Farm Credit Bank |
1:2022cv02263 |
June 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Sarah E Geraghty |
Catherine M Salinas |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER for Service of #6 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 08/05/2022. (rsg) |
Filing 6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 Complaint. In sum, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP was DENIED based on the information that she provided to this Court under penalty of perjury, and she has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by the Court. I therefore RECOMMEND that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court. There being nothing further before me, I DIRECT the Clerk to terminate the reference to me. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 08/05/2022. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Raissa Djuissi Kengne re #7 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (rsg) |
Notification of Docket Correction re #5 MOTION for Appeal under 1292(b). Corrected pdfs of Exhibits 1A and 1B added to #5 docket entry. (bgt) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Appeal under 1292(b) by Raissa Djuissi Kengne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1A, #2 Exhibit 1B, #3 Exhibit 2)(rsg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2022: #4 Corrected Exhibit 1A, #5 Corrected Exhibit 1B) (bgt). |
Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Raissa Djuissi Kengne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Raissa Djuissi Kengne re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (rsg) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Raissa Djuissi Kengne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2 ORDER denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she is ORDERED to pay the appropriate filing fee to the Clerk within 21 days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, Plaintiff must effect service of the summons and complaint upon the defendants in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to pay the filing fee may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-submit this matter to me on July 7, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 06/09/2022. (rsg) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for ifp and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (tas) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raissa Djuissi Kengne. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Affidavit, #3 Notice of Filing Exhibits, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.