Barrett v. Original Lender, MERS et al
Wayne-Anthony Barrett |
Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK, Investor Trust M&T Trust, Et Al, McCalla Raymeir Leibert Pierce, LLC and Housing Urban Development |
1:2022cv02321 |
June 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
William M Ray |
Real Property: Other |
15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 RESPONSE re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Wayne-Anthony Barrett. (tas) |
Filing 19 Certificate of Interested Persons by Wayne-Anthony Barrett. (tas) |
Filing 17 ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to file his Certificate of Interested Persons no later than 8/5/2022. Plaintiff is advised that failure to follow the Court's orders may result in a recommendation to the district judge that the case be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to resubmit this matter to the undersigned upon expiration of the above date if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 7/27/2022. (tas) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Wayne-Anthony Barrett re #17 Order. (tas) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE re #15 Affidavit filed by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK. (Friedman, Rachel) |
Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT by Wayne-Anthony Barrett. (tas) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Bert Falls, Mortgage Fraud Examiner by Wayne-Anthony Barrett. (tas) |
Submission of #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (tas) |
Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Persons by McCalla Raymeir Leibert Pierce, LLC. (Tate, William) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK. (Friedman, Rachel) |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' #10 Motion to Stay (See order for directives). Signed by Judge J. Clay Fuller, on 7/11/2022. (tas) Modified on 7/11/2022 to edit docket text(tas). |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Wayne-Anthony Barrett re #12 Order on Motion to Stay. (tas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by McCalla Raymeir Leibert Pierce, LLC Consent to Removal (Tate, William) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Stay by Defendants with Brief In Support by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Stay, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Friedman, Rachel) |
Submission of #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION for Joinder, to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (clk) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Defendant's #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Wayne-Anthony Barrett. (tas) |
Filing 8 NOTICE Of Filing Affidavit of Fact Writ of Quo Warranto by Wayne-Anthony Barrett (tas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Of Filing Affidavit of Fact Adverse Claim of Title and Reversion of Ancestral Estate by Wayne-Anthony Barrett (tas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Of Filing Affidavit of Fact Memorandum of Trust by Wayne-Anthony Barrett (tas) |
(Minute entry) Doc. 5 Construed as MOTION for Joinder of the #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by McCalla Raymeir Leibert Pierce, LLC. (clk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by McCalla Raymeir Leibert Pierce, LLC re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Joinder with (Tate, William) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK identifying Corporate Parent M&T Bank Corporation for Servicer, M&T BANK; Corporate Parent MERSCORP, Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent ICE Mortgage Services, LLC for Original Lender, MERS. (Friedman, Rachel) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit A - Note, #3 Exhibit B - Deed of Trust, #4 Exhibit C - Assignment)(Friedman, Rachel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Parties. Plaintiff is ADVISED that he must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FED. R. CIV. P.), as well as the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (LR NDGa.). A pro se plaintiff is REQUIRED to provide the Clerk with an original of any further pleadings or other papers filed with the Court after the complaint and is further REQUIRED to SERVE upon the defendant(s) or counsel for the defendant(s), by mail or by hand delivery under FED. R. CIV. P. 5, a copy of every additional pleading or other paper described in FED. R. CIV. P. 5. Plaintiff is also ADVISED that, under LR 7, NDGa., PLEADINGS ALLOWED; FORM OF MOTIONS, if the deadline for a response to a motion passes without a response being filed, the motion is deemed unopposed. Plaintiff is further REQUIRED to keep the Court advised of his current address at all times during the pendency of the lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 6/14/2022. (tas) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Wayne-Anthony Barrett re #2 Notice to Pro Se Parties. (tas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Original Lender, MERS, Servicer, M&T BANK. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11857654) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.