Johnson-Ingram v. City of Union City, GA et al
| Lashanda T Johnson-Ingram |
| City of Union City, GA, City of Union City Police Department and City of Union City Human Resource Department |
| 1:2022cv02402 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| J Elizabeth McBath |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Lashanda T Johnson-Ingram. City of Union City Human Resource Department served on 8/8/2022, answer due 8/29/2022; City of Union City Police Department served on 8/8/2022, answer due 8/29/2022; City of Union City, GA served on 8/8/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. (jkb) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Union City Human Resource Department, City of Union City Police Department, City of Union City, GA. (jkb) |
| Filing 2 Initial Disclosures by Lashanda T Johnson-Ingram.(jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lashanda T Johnson-Ingram. (Filing fee $402, receipt number GAN360002183) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Right to Sue Letter, #2 Filing Fee Receipt, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
