Progressive Lighting, Inc. v. Sherman Arulappan, LLC et al
| Progressive Lighting, Inc. and Progressive Lighting, Inc. doing business as Savoy House |
| Sherman Arulappan, LLC doing business as Trios Distribution, Martina Sherman and Sherman Arulappan, LLC doing business as Trios Distribution doing business as E-Commerce Trade |
| 1:2022cv02951 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Acknowledgement of Service on 8/29/2022 for Defendants. (Katz, Seth) Modified on 9/8/2022 to edit event selected (dob). |
| Submission of #6 Order to Show Cause to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (lme) |
| Notification of Docket Correction re #7 Amended Complaint. Pleading filed with incorrect party designation. Clerk redocketed pleading at #9 . Amended Complaint and made necessary changes. (dob) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Martina Sherman, Sherman Arulappan, LLCwith Jury Demand filed by Progressive Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #6 Order to Show Cause, filed by Progressive Lighting, Inc.. (Katz, Seth) |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT FILING ERROR First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Progressive Lighting, Inc.with Jury Demand filed by Progressive Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ed 1)(Katz, Seth) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 8/30/2022 (dob). |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Progressive Lighting, Inc. SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 8/12/2022. (tmf)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 8/10/2022. (lme)
|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Martina Sherman, Sherman Arulappan, LLC (dba Trios Distribution). (Attachments: #1 Summons Trios)(tmf) |
| Notification of Docket Correction re #2 PROPOSED SUMMONS by Progressive Lighting, Inc. as to Trios Distribution (Katz, Seth) Modified on 8/2/2022 to edit event and text(tmf). |
| Filing 3 DUPLICATE FILING (complaint and Trios summons previously filed) NOTICE by Progressive Lighting, Inc. Copy of Original Complaint (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Sherman Summons, #3 Summons Trios Summons)(Katz, Seth) Modified on 8/2/2022 to add red text(tmf). |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS by Progressive Lighting, Inc. as to Trios Distribution (Katz, Seth) Modified on 8/2/2022 to edit event and text(tmf). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Progressive Lighting, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11953060) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
