Richardson v. Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC
Danielle Richardson |
Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC |
1:2022cv03275 |
August 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
Catherine M Salinas |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lajuana Carmita Ransaw on behalf of Danielle Richardson (Ransaw, Lajuana) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Grant McBride on behalf of Danielle Richardson (McBride, Grant) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lajuana C. Ransaw on behalf of Danielle Richardson (Rittle, Megan) Modified on 10/7/2022 to edit text (gas). Modified on 10/13/2022 *atty emailed re re-filing instructions(gas). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Grant E. McBride on behalf of Danielle Richardson (Rittle, Megan) Modified on 10/13/2022 *atty emailed re re-filing instructions (gas). |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Danielle Richardson. Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC waiver mailed on 8/16/2022, answer due 10/17/2022. (Trimble, Jeremy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Martin B. Heller on behalf of Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC (Heller, Martin) |
Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Leave of Absence. The Court grants her a leave of absence from 09/09/2022 through 12/31/2022 for maternity leave. After due consideration, the Court will GRANT counsel's motion and not require any court appearances during her leave, with the understanding that this case is not stayed, and she and/or her law firm will meet any pretrial obligations that may arise during her leave of absence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 09/09/2022. (jkb) |
Filing 4 Application for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): September 9, 2022-December 31, 2022, by Megan Murren Rittle. (Rittle, Megan) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to CT Corporation System on 8/16/2022. (kxm) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC on 8/16/2022. (kxm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number BGANDC-12000464) filed by Danielle Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kxm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richardson v. Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Danielle Richardson | |
Represented By: | Megan Murren Rittle |
Represented By: | Grant McBride |
Represented By: | Lajuana Carmita Ransaw |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hapag-Lloyd (America), LLC | |
Represented By: | Martin B. Heller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.