Johnson v. City of Atlanta, Georgia
| Lesia Johnson |
| City of Atlanta, Georgia |
| 1:2022cv03511 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Michael L Brown |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court, having considered the Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, hereby GRANTS said Consent Motion and ORDERS the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be extended through and including November 18, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 10/27/2022. (tmf)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re: #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Lesia Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Legare, Cheryl) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by City of Atlanta, Georgia. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Jones, Deitra) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #4 Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended through and including October 21, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 9/23/2022. (jtj)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Deitra Jones on behalf of City of Atlanta, Georgia (Jones, Deitra) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by City of Atlanta, Georgia. (Wilson, Natasha) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Lesia Johnson. City of Atlanta, Georgia served on 9/6/2022, answer due 9/27/2022. (Legare, Cheryl) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to City of Atlanta, Georgia. (jra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lesia Johnson. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12033904) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. City of Atlanta, Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lesia Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl Barnes Legare |
| Represented By: | Marcela X. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Atlanta, Georgia | |
| Represented By: | Deitra Jones |
| Represented By: | Natasha Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
