Pinnacle Management v. Johnson
Pinnacle Management |
Robert Johnson |
1:2022cv03518 |
August 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation filed by Robert Johnson. (ddm) |
Filing 6 Letter to the Magistrate Court of Henry County, Georgia regarding the remand of this action to their court. (ddm) |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting the #3 Final Report and Recommendation as the Opinion and Order of this Court and remanding this action to the Magistrate Court of Henry County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 09/19/2022. (ddm) |
Civil Case Terminated. (ddm) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to the Magistrate Court of Henry County, Georgia, Robert Johnson and Pinnacle Management re #5 Order, #6 Letter. (ddm) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Robert Johnson, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (pdw) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 08/31/2022. (ddm) |
Filing 3 ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting Defendant Johnson's application for leave to proceed IFP for the limited purpose of remand #1 and recommending that this case be remanded to the Magistrate Court of Henry County. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 08/31/2022. (ddm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Robert Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(gas) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Robert Johnson, Pinnacle Management re #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (ddm) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (gas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pinnacle Management v. Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pinnacle Management | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Robert Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.