Seay et al v. Stinson
| Tamika Seay and Melvin Seay |
| Ashley Stinson |
| 1:2022cv03527 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The present IFP application of Plaintiff Tamika Seay #1 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff Melvin Seay must (1) pay the full filing fee; or (2) file a completed application and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs and a copy of the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) to Plaintiff Melvin Seay. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 10/21/2022. (jra)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tamika Seay re #2 Order ruling on IFP. (jra) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Melvin Seay re #2 Order ruling on IFP., Forms sent to party: Affidavit to Proceed IFP. (jra) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (ceo) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melvin Seay, Tamika Seay. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
