Montford et al v. Advanced Urology, Inc. et al
Yonikki Montford and Ava Palmer |
Advanced Urology, Inc. and Advanced Management Solutions, LLC |
1:2022cv03572 |
September 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay All Proceedings with Brief In Support by Yonikki Montford, Ava Palmer. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barbaree, Tracey) |
|
|
Refund in the amount of $402.00 has been processed, effective 9/8/2022 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns) |
Clerks Approval re #4 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec) |
Filing 4 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number 12043508. (Barbaree, Tracey) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Advanced Urology, Inc. (lwb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Advanced Management Solutions, LLC. (lwb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Yonikki Montford and Ava Palmer. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12043508) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.