Lamar v. Ahuama Jonas
| Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar |
| Dr. Mzola U. Ahuama Jonas |
| 1:2022cv03847 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Linda T Walker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim. (rsg)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 10/28/2022. (rsg)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (rsg) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Clerk's Judgment. (rsg) |
| Submission of #2 Final Report and Recommendation to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. (usw) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar. (ane) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar re #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #2 Final Report and Recommendation. (rsg) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation,, Order ruling on IFP, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 09/30/2022. (rsg)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only, and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 09/30/2022. (rsg) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and frivolity, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (ceo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lamar v. Ahuama Jonas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dewayne Emmanuel Lamar | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dr. Mzola U. Ahuama Jonas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
