Muhammad v. Sheppard et al
Furquan S. Muhammad |
Regional Director Stan Sheppard, Captain Scott and Warden of Montgomery State Prison |
1:2022cv03874 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
J Elizabeth McBath |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case electronically transferred to Southern District of Georgia, Dublin Division. (ane) |
New Civil Action Number in USDC SDGA 3:22-cv-0136 (aar) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Furquan S. Muhammad re #2 Order. (ane) |
Filing 2 ORDER: The Court TRANSFERS this action to the Southern District of Georgia, Dublin Division, for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 10/5/2022. (ane) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath terminated from case. (ane) |
Submission of Complaint #1 for IFP and Frivolity Determination to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (lwb) Modified on 9/27/2022 (lwb). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Furquan S. Muhammad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.