Moore v. Kijakazi
| Carla Moore |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv03915 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J Elizabeth McBath |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service Executed by Carla Moore. All Defendants. (Burgess, Anjel) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Blank USM Form)(rlh) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Carla Moore. (rlh) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed by Carla Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rlh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO FORWARD sufficient USM 285 Forms to Plaintiff's counsel. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order so that process may be served upon Defendant. Upon receipt of the forms by the Clerk, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshal's Service service packages for Defendant. If counsel for Plaintiff prefers, counsel may arrange for service of the complaint to Defendant without involving the U.S. Marshal. So that such service may be effected without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 10/21/2022. (rlh)
|
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: #6 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:22-cv-3915-JEM. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (rlh) |
| Submission of #2 Order, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (ceo) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT in Support of the Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Carla Moore. (Burgess, Anjel) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: As a result, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, to either (1) file an amended application to proceed IFP and answer fully and truthfully all questions posed, or (2) pay the full filing fee. Plaintiff is ADVISED that failure to comply with the terms of this provision of this Order shall result in a recommendation to the District Court that this action be dismissed. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this action to the undersigned for further consideration in twenty-four (24) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 10/3/2022. (jra)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carla Moore. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge, #4 Proposed Summons)(kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
