James v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
Sullivan James |
Jeld-Wen, Inc. |
1:2022cv03945 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Victoria M Calvert |
John K Larkins |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Jeld-Wen, Inc.. Discovery ends on 4/13/2023.(Pope, Benson) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Hold Rule 26(F) Conference and File Related Reports and Disclosures by Jeld-Wen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pope, Benson) |
ORDER by docket entry only granting #8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Hold Rule 26(F) Conference and File Related Reports and Disclosures. The parties have until 12/14/2022 to hold their Rule 26(f) conference. The Rule 26(f) report and joint discovery plan will be due 12/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 11/09/2022. (lg) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jeld-Wen, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Jeld-Wen Holding, Inc. for Jeld-Wen, Inc.. (Novosel, Nichole) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons by Sullivan James. (Morrison-Richardson, Ianna) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nichole Chang Novosel on behalf of Jeld-Wen, Inc. (Novosel, Nichole) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief In Support by Jeld-Wen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pope, Benson) |
ORDER by docket entry only granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Because the requested deadline is a holiday, Jeld-Wen, Inc.'s Answer or other response will be due 11/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/24/2022. (lg) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Sullivan James. Jeld-Wen, Inc. served on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Morrison-Richardson, Ianna) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Jeld-Wen, Inc. (kxm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12101102) filed by Sullivan James. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kxm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: James v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sullivan James | |
Represented By: | Ianna Morrison-Richardson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jeld-Wen, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Benson Edward Pope |
Represented By: | Nichole Chang Novosel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.