Payne v. The Kroger Co.
Tabatha Payne |
The Kroger Co. |
1:2022cv03971 |
October 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Sarah E Geraghty |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Initial Disclosures by Tabatha Payne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A- Witness List, #2 Exhibit Attachment C- Document Descriptions, #3 Exhibit Attachment D- Damages Descriptions)(Princenthal, Adam) |
Filing 10 ORDER: This case will remain in the Atlanta Division. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 11/3/2022. (ane) |
Filing 9 JOINT NOTICE re #6 Order by The Kroger Co. (Jarman, Camille) Modified text on 11/3/2022 (ane). |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons by The Kroger Co.. (Jarman, Camille) |
Filing 7 Initial Disclosures by The Kroger Co..(Jarman, Camille) |
Filing 6 ORDER: The parties are DIRECTED to confer and file a joint notice by no later than November 2, 2022, to advise the Court of their respective positions on a possible transfer of this case to the Gainesville Division. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 10/21/22. (ceo) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #4 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan: This case shall proceed on a 6-month discovery track. Discovery commences on November 2, 2022, and shall conclude on May 1, 2023. Daubert motions with regard to expert testimony shall be filed no later than 30 days after the close of discovery. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 10/21/22. (ceo) |
Filing 4 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by The Kroger Co.. (Jarman, Camille) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 10/7/2022. (sap) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by The Kroger Co. Originally filed in State Court of Cobb County on 8/12/2022. Discovery ends on 3/2/2023.(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by The Kroger Co. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12105297) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Petition For Removal, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Payne v. The Kroger Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tabatha Payne | |
Represented By: | Adam P. Princenthal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
Represented By: | Camille N. Jarman |
Represented By: | Matthew G. Moffett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.