Clark v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
| Joe Nathan Clark |
| Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Sgt. Crutchfield, Deputy Gracia, Deputy Venlenzia, Kebo Taylor, Norman, Meritt, Ms. Johnson, Ms. Wolfford, Correct Health and Nurse Ms. Joseph |
| 1:2022cv04201 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (jra) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 10/24/2022. (dob)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joe Nathan Clark re #4 Order. (dob) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, #3 MOTION for Identifiable Records, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (ceo) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Identifiable Records by Joe Nathan Clark. (ceo) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Joe Nathan Clark. (ceo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joe Nathan Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
