Dorsey v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
| Ronny D. Dorsey |
| John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Sonny, J.J. Goforth, J. Radcliffe, Jeff, Don, Dave, John View and Greg Slaughter |
| 1:2022cv04312 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Michael L Brown |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #4 Order to Show Cause to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jpk) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failing to comply with an Order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 12/5/2022. (dob)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ronny D. Dorsey re #4 Order to Show Cause. (dob) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Ronny D. Dorsey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ronny D. Dorsey re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 9 summonses, 9 usm 285's, initial disclosure form. (tmf) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the USM 285 form, summons, and the initial disclosures form. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the USM 285 form, summons, and the initial disclosures form, and to return to the Clerk of Court one of each for each Defendant named in the complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order. Upon receipt of the forms by the Clerk, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a service waiver package for each Defendant. Upon completion of the service waiver packages, the Clerk is DIRECTED to complete the lower portion of the Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver form and to mail a service waiver package to each Defendant. In the event that any Defendant does not return the Waiver of Service form to the Clerk of Court within thirty-five (35) days following the date the service waiver package was mailed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshals Service a service package for that Defendant. The service package must include the USM 285 form, the summons, and one (1) copy of the complaint. Upon receipt of the service package, the U.S. Marshals Service is DIRECTED to personally serve the Defendant. The executed waiver form or the completed USM 285 form shall be filed with the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 11/7/2022. (dob)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand for IFP and Frivolity Determination (jra) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by J.J. Goforth, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, Norfolk Southern Corporation, J. Radcliffe, Greg Slaughter, and John View. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
