McCall v. State of Michigan et al
Bondary McCall |
Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Director Heidi E. Washington, Chairman Brian Shipman, Judge James Biernat, Procecuter Peter J. Lucido, Donald Clayton Miller, Attorney General Dana Nessel and State of Michigan |
1:2022cv04328 |
October 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #3 MOTION to Supplement #1 Complaint to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. (dmb) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 11/4/2022. (dmb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Bondary McCall re #4 Order on Motion for TRO. (dmb) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Supplement #1 Complaint by Bondary McCall. (dmb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order NO IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED by Bondary McCall. (rsg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bondary McCall. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number GAN100142026) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order NO IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED, to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr.. (rsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.