Slack v. Eaton et al
| Danmond Jonathan Slack |
| Charles M. Eaton, Jr., Fani T. Willis, Cathelene "Tina" Robinson and Chris Carr |
| 1:2022cv04347 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (tmf) |
| Notification of Docket Correction re #8 NOTICE of Filing Letter re #5 Objections to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (received by docket clerk 12/8/2022)(tmf) Modified on 12/8/2022 to edit event and text(tmf). |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action (tmf)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. #3 ] as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiffs, case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(A). The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 12/5/2022. (tmf)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tmf) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Danmond Jonathan Slack re #7 Clerk's Judgment, #6 Order on Final Report and Recommendation,. (tmf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Letter re #5 Objections to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (received by docket clerk 12/8/2022)(tmf) Modified on 12/8/2022 to edit event and text(tmf). |
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (tmf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation,,, Order ruling on IFP,, by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 11/10/2022. (tmf)
|
|
Filing 3
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Danmond Jonathan Slack, ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this complaint be DISMISSED as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. IT IS ORDERED that status for Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2 ] is GRANTED for the purpose of dismissal only. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 11/10/2022. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Danmond Jonathan Slack re #3 Final Report and Recommendation,,, Order ruling on IFP,, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation,. (tmf) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (nmb) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (nmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Danmond Jonathan Slack. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
