Trevari v. Ricks et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan-Michael Trevari
Defendant: Director Stephen Ricks, Counselor Ms. Fairly, Monitor Mr. Mann and Dismas Charities Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv04352
Filed: November 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Mark H Cohen
Referring Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (jpa)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist--
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. LR 41.3A(2), NDGa. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this file. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 12/27/22. (jpa)
December 27, 2022 Civil Case Terminated. (jpa)
December 27, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jonathan-Michael Trevari re #6 Order to Dismiss, #7 Clerk's Judgment. (jpa)
December 15, 2022 Submission of #5 Order on Report and Recommendation and Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (lme)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER approving and adopting #2 Report and Recommendations.; denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be given fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to pay the required filing fee in this case. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 11/29/2022. (dob)
November 29, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jonathan-Michael Trevari re #5 Order. (dob)
November 28, 2022 Submission of #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan-Michael Trevari to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (lme)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Mark H. Cohen for all further proceedings. Judge Amy Totenberg no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:22-cv-4352-MHC. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/14/2022. (dob)
November 14, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jonathan-Michael Trevari re #4 Order Reassigning Case. (dob)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 11/9/22. (jpa)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NON-FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. The Court further RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff be ORDERED to pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date the District Judge enters a final order, and that Plaintiff be ADVISED that failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 11/9/22. (jpa)
November 9, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jonathan-Michael Trevari re #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (jpa)
November 2, 2022 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for ifp and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (tas)
November 1, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan-Michael Trevari. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trevari v. Ricks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan-Michael Trevari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director Stephen Ricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Counselor Ms. Fairly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monitor Mr. Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dismas Charities Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?