Clarke v. Adams et al
| Joseph Alexander Clarke |
| Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, Fani T. Willis, Cathelene Tina Robinson and Chris Carr |
| 1:2022cv04408 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| John K Larkins |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Transmission of Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal, Judgment, Order, Report and Recommendation, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #8 Notice of Appeal. (pjm) |
| Filing 9 USCA Appeal Transmission Letter to USCA- 11th Circuit re: #8 Notice of Appeal, filed by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (pjm) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Clerk's Judgment and #6 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 USCA Appeal Fee Letter)(NOA NEF, Mot IFP, and Appeal Fee Letter sent)(cc:USCA)(pjm) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (jra)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joseph Alexander Clarke re #7 Clerk's Judgment and #6 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (jra) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. #3 , as its opinion: this matter is DISMISSED as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 12/02/2022. (jra)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (jra) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (jra) (Attachment(s): #1 Attached Documents) (jra). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Order ruling on IFP; Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 11/14/22. (jra)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this complaint be DISMISSED as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. IT IS ORDERED that status for Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED for the purpose of dismissal only.The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 11/14/2022. (jra)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joseph Alexander Clarke re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (jra) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (gas) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (gas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Alexander Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
