Ajanaku v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation et al
| Bisa Ajanaku |
| Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority doing business as Grady Hospital, Timothy Jefferson and John Haupert |
| 1:2022cv04512 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerks Notation re #10 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by Mark H. Cohen. (lme) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons by Bisa Ajanaku. (Balasubramanian, Anita) |
Filing 9
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file the required certificate of interested persons no later than Friday,January 6, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 1/3/2023. (dob)
|
| Clerks Notation re #8 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by Mark H. Cohen. (lme) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons by Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, John Haupert, Timothy Jefferson. (Whitehead, Steven) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, John Haupert, Timothy Jefferson. Discovery ends on 5/22/2023.(Whitehead, Steven) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, John Haupert, Timothy Jeffersonwith Jury Demand filed by Bisa Ajanaku.(Balasubramanian, Anita) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, #1 Notice of Removal,, Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority Answer due 12/15/2022; Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation Answer due 12/15/2022; John Haupert Answer due 12/15/2022; Timothy Jefferson Answer due 12/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/2/2022. (dob)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Second) by Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, John Haupert, Timothy Jefferson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Whitehead, Steven) Modified on 12/2/2022 to edit event selected (dob). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING #2 unopposed motion for extension of time. Defendants shall have through and including December 5, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/21/2022. (nlj)
|
| Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, John Haupert, Timothy Jefferson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Whitehead, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, Timothy Jefferson, John Haupert, Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12195430) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
