Douglas v. Sugar Foods Corporation
| Mohangany Douglas |
| Sugar Foods Corporation |
| 1:2022cv04604 |
| November 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER: The Court GRANTS #20 the Parties' joint motion for extension of time to file the pretrial order. The time for filing the proposed pretrial order is extended to October 27, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 9/29/2023. (jtj)
|
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Order by Sugar Foods Corporation. (Borna, Emily) |
| Submission of 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (bnp) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Mohangany Douglas (Fonteneau, Kira) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #17 the Parties' joint motion for extension of time to complete discovery. Discovery will close on August 10, 2023, and dispositive motions shall be filed by September 11, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 5/04/2023. (jtj)
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Deadline for Dispositive Motions by Sugar Foods Corporation. (Borna, Emily) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Discovery Materials by Sugar Foods Corporation.(Borna, Emily) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Discovery Requests by Sugar Foods Corporation.(Borna, Emily) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER MODIFYING LOCAL RULES REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT: The parties are ORDERED to abide by the Local Rules and these guidelines: The Movant's Statement of Material Facts. Each fact must be separately numbered, and there may be only one sentence per number. Each fact must be followed by a citation to the record that supports the fact. The Court will not consider more than 50 numbered facts. The movant may present more than 50 numbered facts only by first seeking and receiving leave of the Court to do so. The Non-Movant's Response to the Statement of Material Facts. The non-movant's response to the movant's statement of material facts must follow the numbering scheme set forth in the movant's statement. The non-movant shall restate the movants fact and then indicate whether the fact is admitted or disputed. If the non-movant disputes or partially disputes the fact, then the non-movant must offer a brief factual explanation, not to exceed one paragraph, supported by a citation to the record. If the non-moving party has an evidentiary objection to the fact, the party may briefly note the objection. However, the party may not litigate the objection in the response to the statement of material facts. To the extent the party wishes to offer a legal argument to support the objection, the party may do so in a separately filed Notice of Objection or within the brief. Responses in the form of issues, questions, or legal conclusions (rather than facts) will not be considered. The Non-Movants Statement of Additional Facts that are Material and Present a Genuine Issue for Trial. The non-movants statement of additional facts shall conform to the guidelines set forth above in paragraph 1. The Movants Response to the Statement of Additional Facts. The movant's response to the non-movant's statement of additional facts must follow the numbering scheme set forth in the non-movant's statement. The movant shall restate the fact and then offer a response as permitted by the Local Rules: An objection to the admissibility of the evidence upon which the non-movant relies; An objection that the evidence does not support the fact, with a brief explanation and citation to the record if necessary; An objection that the fact is not material or does not otherwise comply with Local Rule 56.1(B)(1); and A concession that the Court can properly consider the evidence for purposes of the summary judgment motion. As noted above, the movant may briefly note an evidentiary objection. However, the party may not litigate the objection in the response to the statement of additional facts. To the extent the party wishes to offer a legal argument to support the evidentiary objection, the party may do so in a separately filed Notice of Objection or within the brief. Deposition Transcripts. Any party that relies on deposition testimony shall file a complete copy of the deposition transcript. This allows the Court to understand the full context of the witnesss testimony surrounding the specific citation offered by the party. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 2/2/2023. (jra)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #11 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan & #12 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan: Discovery ends on 5/12/2023. Motions due by 6/12/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 2/1/2023. (jra)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Mohangany Douglas. (Fonteneau, Kira) |
| Filing 11 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Sugar Foods Corporation. (White, Kathryn) |
| Filing 10 RULE 5.4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sugar Foods Corporation.(White, Kathryn) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons & Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sugar Foods Corporation.(White, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 8
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER OF CONFIDENTIALITY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 1/3/23. (jra)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION and Order of Confidentiality (Joint) by Sugar Foods Corporation. (Borna, Emily)
|
| Filing 6 Joint Stipulation and Order of Confidentiality by Sugar Foods Corporation and Mohangany Douglas (White, Kathryn) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Sugar Foods Corporation. Discovery ends on 5/12/2023.(Borna, Emily) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service as to Sugar Foods Corporation. (Fonteneau, Kira) Modified on 12/8/2022 (jra). |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Sugar Foods Corporation. (lwb) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Mohangany Douglas. (lwb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Mohangany Douglas. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12209586) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Douglas v. Sugar Foods Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mohangany Douglas | |
| Represented By: | Kira Yalon Fonteneau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sugar Foods Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Emily S. Borna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
