Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
Plaintiff: Davious Boyd
Defendant: Riverbend Correctional Facility and Lt. Baker
Case Number: 1:2022cv04682
Filed: November 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 New Civil Action Number in USDC MDGA 5:22-cv-0448 (aar)
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs, cases are TRANSFERRED to the USDC, Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 12/20/2022. (tmf)
December 20, 2022 Case electronically transferred to USDC MDGA- Macon Division. (tmf)
December 20, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Davious Boyd re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (tmf)
December 20, 2022 Civil Case Terminated. (tmf)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 11/29/2022. (dob)
November 29, 2022 Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #1 Complaint, filed by Davious Boyd be transferred to the Macon Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 11/29/2022. (dob)
November 29, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Davious Boyd re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Davious Boyd, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation,. (dob)
November 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Davious Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
November 23, 2022 Submission of #1 Complaint for ifp and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (lwb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davious Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverbend Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?