Do et al v. Jaddou
| Duy Tran Do, Ha Thi Thu Do, Khoa Duy Do and My Ha Do |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2022cv04770 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Duy Tran Do. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 12/7/2022, answer due 2/6/2023. (Alwan, Zainab) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (jra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Duy Tran Do, Ha Thi Thu Do, My Ha Do, Khoa Duy Do. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12233970) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Principal Plaintiffs Passport Biographic Page and Admission Stamp, #2 Exhibit I-526 Immigration Petition by Alien Entrepreneur Approval Notice, #3 Exhibit Lawful Permanent Resident Cards for Plaintiffs, #4 Exhibit I-829 Petition to Remove Conditional Resident Status Receipt Notices, #5 Exhibit Historical Case Processing Times, #6 Exhibit USCIS.gov Case Current Processing Times Report for form I-829, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
