Seay v. United States Department of Justice et al
Plaintiff: Tamika Seay
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Andrea David Vega and Judge Robert V. Rodatus
Case Number: 1:2022cv04922
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Leigh Martin May
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tamika Seay re #10 Order on Motion to Amend. (jra)
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The motion to amend the case style #8 , is therefore DENIED as futile. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (providing that a pleading must contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief). If Plaintiff seeks to add a defendant, she must file an amended complaint in compliance with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffis CAUTIONED that any amended complaint will completely supersede the original complaint and therefore must contain all of the claims Plaintiff seeks to assert in this action; the Court will not read the amended complaint in conjunction with the original complaint. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/30/2023. (jra)
January 24, 2023 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT FOR MANUAL FILING OF EXHIBITS by Tamika Seay. (jra) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/25/2023: #1 Exhibit Part 2) (jra).
January 24, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION AND REOUEST FOR ORDER TO CHANGE STYLE OF CASE by Tamika Seay. (jra)
January 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The application to proceed IFP #1 , is DENIED AS MOOT; the Court DECLINES to adopt the Report and Recommendation AS MOOT #2 ; and the motion to consolidate cases #4 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/20/23. (jra)
January 20, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tamika Seay re #7 Order. (jra)
January 20, 2023 *ENTERED IN ERRONEOUSLY* - CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (jra)
January 17, 2023 Filing 6 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Tamika Seay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
January 17, 2023 Filing Fee Paid: $ 402.00, receipt number 100000987 (jra)
January 13, 2023 Filing 5 Notice Of Filing: re #4 Motion to Consolidate Cases by Tamika Seay (jra)
January 13, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Tamika Seay. (jra)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 1/5/2023. (jra)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's IFP application be DENIED.4 The Court further RECOMMENDS that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she be ordered to pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date the District Judge enters a final order, and she be ADVISED that failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action. See David, 2020 WL 9595479, at *2. As all matters referred to the undersigned have been ruled upon, the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference of this matter to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 1/5/2023. (jra)
January 5, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tamika Seay re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION & #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (jra)
December 14, 2022 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for ifp and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (tas)
December 13, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamika Seay. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seay v. United States Department of Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamika Seay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrea David Vega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Robert V. Rodatus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?