Bright Capture LLC v. Acuant, Inc.
Bright Capture LLC |
Acuant, Inc. |
1:2022cv04975 |
December 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Acuant, Inc.'s Answer due 3/13/2023. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 2/9/23. (jpa) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Acuant, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Further Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond)(McDaniel, Petrina) |
Clerks Notation re #10 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by Mark H. Cohen. (lme) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons by Acuant, Inc.. (McDaniel, Petrina) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 and #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Acuant, Inc.'s Answer due 2/10/2023. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 1/10/23. (jpa) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Acuant, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond)(McDaniel, Petrina) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Acuant, Inc.. (McDaniel, Petrina) |
Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by Mark H. Cohen. (lme) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER RE: CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 12/28/2022. (lme) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Acuant, Inc.. (dob) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Bright Capture LLC (Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (jkb) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Bright Capture LLC. (jkb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Bright Capture LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12268506) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bright Capture LLC v. Acuant, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bright Capture LLC | |
Represented By: | Cortney Scott Alexander |
Represented By: | Cortney Alexander |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Acuant, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Petrina Ann McDaniel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.