Glass v. Rickman et al
| Kardarius Kantrez Glass |
| Deby Ann Rickman and Magistrate Court |
| 1:2022cv05011 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Kardarius Kantrez Glass.(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to submit this action to the District Judge for review of Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 12/21/2022. c:Financial Office(tas)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Kardarius Kantrez Glass re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tas) |
| Submission of #3 Complaint, for frivolity determination, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (tas) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kardarius Kantrez Glass. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (ceo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
