United Community Bank v. Eckardt Group, LLC et al
| United Community Bank |
| Eckardt Group, LLC, Eckardt Electric Co. and John R. Stephens |
| 1:2022cv05025 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Community Bank identifying Corporate Parent United Community Bank for United Community Bank. (Levy, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to John R. Stephens. (lwb) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Eckardt Group, LLC. (lwb) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Eckardt Electric Co. (lwb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by United Community Bank. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12276709) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
