Bliss v. Corecivic, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kathleen Bliss
Defendant: Corecivic, Inc.
Respondent: State Bar of Georgia
Case Number: 1:2022mi00059
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: J P Boulee
Referring Judge: J Elizabeth McBath
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #9 Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (jkl)
November 16, 2022 Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (jkl)
November 14, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Kathleen Bliss. (Delbridge, Charles)
November 7, 2022 Submission of #8 Response to Order to Show Cause, #5 Order to Show Cause, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (adg)
November 3, 2022 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause filed by Kathleen Bliss. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Charles A. Delbridge in Support of Bliss's Response to Order to Show Cause)(Delbridge, Charles) Text modified on 11/7/2022 (adg).
November 3, 2022 Filing 7 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER To Resolve Blisss Motion to Transfer or, Alternatively, to Compel Compliance with Subpoena. (Delbridge, Charles)
November 2, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Nish Arndt on behalf of State Bar of Georgia (Arndt, Patrick)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Docket entry Order granting Charles Delbridge's #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice and granting Matthew Helland's #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. So ordered by Judge J. P. Boulee on 10/27/22. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(jkl)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #1 Motion to Transfer or, Alternatively, to Compel Compliance with Subpoena. if Bliss served the Motion upon the Bar and CoreCivic, Inc., prior to the entry of this Order, then Bliss is ORDERED, within 7 days of the entry of this Order, to file a certificate of service stating that service was effectuated and on what date service was effectuated. Otherwise, Bliss is ORDERED, within 14 days of the entry of this Order, to SHOW CAUSE why her Motion should not be denied for failure to serve her Motion upon the Bar and upon CoreCivic, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 10/26/2022. (adg)
October 12, 2022 Refund in the amount of $402.00 has been processed, effective 10/12/2022 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns)
October 11, 2022 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Charles Delbridge Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12109284). Attorney Charles Delbridge added appearing on behalf of Kathleen Bliss (pdt)
October 6, 2022 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #4 APPLICATION for Admission of Matthew Helland Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12109294). Attorney Matthew C. Helland added appearing on behalf of Kathleen Bliss (cdg)
October 4, 2022 Clerks Approval re #2 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec)
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Admission of Matthew Helland Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12109294).by Kathleen Bliss. (Farahany, Amanda) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of Charles Delbridge Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12109284).by Kathleen Bliss. (Farahany, Amanda) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
September 30, 2022 Filing 2 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC-12098298. (Farahany, Amanda)
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Transfer Case to U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, MOTION to Compel to Comply with Subpoena by Kathleen Bliss. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Charles A. Delbridge, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(gas)
September 29, 2022 Filing Fee Paid: $ 49, receipt number AGANDC-12099127 (gas)
September 29, 2022 Submission of #1 MOTION to Transfer Case to U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada MOTION to Compel to Comply with Subpoena to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (gas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bliss v. Corecivic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Bliss
Represented By: Amanda A. Farahany
Represented By: Charles A. Delbridge
Represented By: Matthew C. Helland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corecivic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State Bar of Georgia
Represented By: Patrick Nish Arndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?