Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Lazer Spot, Inc. |
| 1:2022mi00060 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Linda T Walker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #3 Order to Show Cause,,, filed by Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Bartlett, Brett) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Christopher Bartlett on behalf of Lazer Spot, Inc. (Bartlett, Brett) |
| Filing 5 Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): December 6-8, 2022, December 21-28, 2022, by Fahad Ali Khan. (Khan, Fahad) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order to Show Cause and #1 APPLICATION for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Khan, Fahad) Modified on 10/27/2022 to link to Doc. #1 (adg). |
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff serve Respondent with a copy of this Order to Show Cause, along with its Application and Memorandum in Support, on or before 11/7/2022, and file a proof of service in compliance with Rule4(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Process server Melina Webber of Metro Legal Support is hereby specially appointed to make this service. Respondent shall file and serve its answer to the Application and response to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support within 21 days from the date it is served. If Respondent files an answer and response, Plaintiff shall then have 14 days within which to file any reply. Once briefing is complete, the Court may, in its discretion, decide to hold a hearing if either party requests one. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 10/21/2022. (adg)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE Of Filing Exhibit 2 re #1 APPLICATION for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Emails)(Khan, Fahad) Modified on 10/6/2022 (adg) |
| Submission of #1 MOTION for Order to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Attachments 1-15, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Fahad Ali Khan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett Christopher Bartlett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
