Green v. Scandett et al
| Marlon Green |
| Warden Reginald Scandett, State of Georgia, Henry County District Attorney, Judge Amero, Sabriya Hill, Ms. Nichols, Judge Williams and Larry Bowman |
| 1:2023cv00118 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Victoria M Calvert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Marlon Green re #7 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #8 Order for Service. (lwb) |
Filing 8
ORDER for Service of #7 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on February 22, 2023. (lwb)
|
|
Filing 7
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint and #4 Amended Complaint, filed by Marlon Green. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to obey a lawful order of the Court. Plaintiff's requests to proceed IFP #2 and #5 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on February 22, 2023. (lwb)
|
|
ORDER denying as moot #5 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on February 22, 2023. (lwb)
|
| Submission of #3 Orderto Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (vs) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Marlon Green. (lwb) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marlon Green. (lwb) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Marlon Green.(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the $402.00 full initial filing and administrative fees, or a properly completed and executed financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis that the Clerk will send him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should Plaintiff decide to pursue any claim(s), he must, within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, file an amended complaint using the form that the Clerk of Court will send him. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 1/12/2023. (gas)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Marlon Green re #3 Order. Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization; 42:1983 Forms (gas) |
| Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jkb) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marlon Green. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marlon Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
