Matz v. 3M Company
Amy Louise Matz |
3M Company |
1:2023cv00478 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Thomas W Thrash |
Linda T Walker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerks Notation re #8 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Reviewed and approved by Judge Thrash. (jeh) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M Company. (Turner, Natalie) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Turner, Natalie) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412794). Attorney Robert E. Barnes, Jr. added appearing on behalf of Amy Louise Matz (cdg) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Lexis Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412763). Attorney Lexis Anderson added appearing on behalf of Amy Louise Matz (cdg) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412794).by Amy Louise Matz. (Coffman, Jason) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Lexis Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412763).by Amy Louise Matz. (Coffman, Jason) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 4 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Lexis Anderson. Clerk to follow-up by 2/23/2023. (cdg) |
Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Clerk to follow-up by 2/23/2023. (cdg) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (pdt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Amy Louise Matz. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12358056) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Matz v. 3M Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amy Louise Matz | |
Represented By: | Jason H. Coffman |
Represented By: | Lexis Anderson |
Represented By: | Robert E. Barnes, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 3M Company | |
Represented By: | Natalie Nicole Turner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.