Matz v. 3M Company
Plaintiff: Amy Louise Matz
Defendant: 3M Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv00478
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Thomas W Thrash
Referring Judge: Linda T Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2023 Clerks Notation re #8 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Reviewed and approved by Judge Thrash. (jeh)
March 28, 2023 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M Company. (Turner, Natalie)
March 28, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Turner, Natalie)
March 2, 2023 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412794). Attorney Robert E. Barnes, Jr. added appearing on behalf of Amy Louise Matz (cdg)
March 2, 2023 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Lexis Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412763). Attorney Lexis Anderson added appearing on behalf of Amy Louise Matz (cdg)
February 23, 2023 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412794).by Amy Louise Matz. (Coffman, Jason) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
February 23, 2023 Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Lexis Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12412763).by Amy Louise Matz. (Coffman, Jason) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
February 13, 2023 Filing 4 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Lexis Anderson. Clerk to follow-up by 2/23/2023. (cdg)
February 13, 2023 Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Robert E. Barnes, Jr. Clerk to follow-up by 2/23/2023. (cdg)
February 1, 2023 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (pdt)
February 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Amy Louise Matz. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12358056) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matz v. 3M Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Louise Matz
Represented By: Jason H. Coffman
Represented By: Lexis Anderson
Represented By: Robert E. Barnes, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Natalie Nicole Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?